Grupo Alarcos · Conference paper · 2007
Using Practitioners for Assessing the Understandability of UML Statechart Diagrams with Composite States
José Antonio Cruz Lemus, Marcela Genero Bocco, Sandro Morasca, Mario Piattini Velthuis
We have carried out a family of empirical studies to investigate whether the use of composite states improves the understandability of UML statechart diagrams. Our hypothesis derived from conventional wisdom, which says that hierarchical modeling mechanisms are helpful to master a system’s complexity. We carried out three studies that have gradually evolved in the size of the UML statechart models, the type of subjects (students vs. professionals), the familiarity of the subjects with the domains of the diagrams, and other factors. In this work we briefly review the first and second studies and present the third one, performed with practitioners as experimental subjects. Surprisingly, our results do not seem to show that the use of composite states improves the understandability of UML statechart diagrams.
On the same topic
- 2009 Assessing the understandability of UML statechart diagrams with composite states-A family of empirical studies
- 2005 Evaluating the effect of composite states on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams
- 2005 An empirical study of the nesting level of composite states within UML statechart diagrams
- 2005 Do composite states improve the understanding of UML statechart diagrams